By Kevin Collison
The Steamboat Arabia Museum, one of Kansas City’s bigger tourism draws, has a tentative agreement to set sail from the City Market to St. Charles, Missouri, according to city officials there.
“We do have a letter of intent that’s signed, sealed and delivered,” St. Charles Mayor Dan Borgmeyer told CityScene.
The Steamboat Arabia Museum is one of the top tourism attractions in Kansas City. It ranked third behind the National World War I Museum and Memorial and the Nelson-Atkins Art Gallery in a survey last year by Tripadvisor.
If the museum moves to the St. Louis suburb, it would be a homecoming of sorts for the steamboat that sank near here in 1856 while hauling cargo up the Missouri River to the western frontier.
The ship’s owner was Capt. John Shaw, a St. Charles resident. His historic home remains there and Shaw is buried in the city cemetery.
“If it should be anyplace, it should be here,” Borgmeyer said.
News of the potential move to St. Charles first was reported earlier this month by Tony Messenger, a columnist for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.
David Hawley, the owner and operator of the Steamboat Arabia Museum, could not be reached for comment.
A representative for the operator of the City Market declined to comment.
In a January interview with Steve Kraske on KCUR Up to Date, Hawley was pessimistic about the museum staying in Kansas City. It’s been a City Market fixture for 30 years. His family began salvaging the wreck found buried in a field in 1988.
“I wish I could say there was a whole lot going on here, but there’s really not,” he told Kraske. “I’ve had discussions with almost everybody you could imagine. It’s not for lack of support.
“The folks in Kansas City and the region surrounding us have so supported this museum. They’ve come time and time and they bring their guests.
“It would break their heart to see this move and it would break mine as well, too.
“The fact of the matter is, this is not a small endeavor.”
Hawley estimated it would cost $50 million to build a museum big enough to accommodate both the artifacts recovered from the Arabia as well as another Missouri River steamboat his museum plans to salvage, the Malta.
Borgmeyer said St. Charles has a couple options in mind for the Arabia and Malta exhibits.
“There’s an investment group with a grand plan that calls for hotels, restaurants, the steamboat and everything else,” he said. “Another option is just the steamboat.”
St. Charles economic development director Mike Klinghammer told CityScene one potential location where his city could locate a future National Steamboat Museum is a 15-acre site located between the Katy Trail and the Missouri River.
“The Steamboat Arabia and the city are mutually in agreement to work exclusively with each other to bring the museum to this city,” Klinghammer said, adding St. Charles has six months to complete a development agreement.
“We’re in the conceptual stage,” he said. “We need to work together on which site and assess the costs.
“It’s important to note, the City of Kansas City has said it’s not going to extend the (museum) lease anymore.”
The city owns the City Market buildings.
Like the mayor, Klinghammer said his city would be an appropriate home for the Arabia. He also noted the Malta was owned by the historically important Chouteau family of St. Louis and was transporting goods to be traded for furs with Native Americans when it sank.
“St. Charles is a river town and steamboats were a big part of our history,” Klinghammer said.
Hawley told KCUR his museum has about five years left on its lease in the City Market.
“The sand is running out of the hour glass for us and we’ve got five years to figure this out,” he said.
Borgmeyer said that answer may come this year under the terms of the letter of intent with his city.
“We have six months to deliver,” he said.
Liam Dai contributed to this report
Don’t miss any downtown news, sign up for our weekly CityScene KC email review here.
The city, by deciding not to renew the lease, has determined that the building and area are better off without the museum and its tourist draw.
Maybe they know something we don’t…maybe they don’t.
I do not understand how one writes an article like this without also reporting why Kansas City is not extending the lease.
I wish I knew…do you?
Last year the city announced they were raising rents and trying to attract more bars and restaurants. Maybe the museum is just twisting “not renewing the lease at the same rate” into “not renewing the lease?”
Oh man, this is so sad. I agree with the other commenters though – if it’s such a huge tourist draw it seems very odd the city seems to not care that they’re leaving. Is there more to the story…? Still, it seems quite weird.
Yep, same question. Kevin, what’s the deal there?
Has anyone considered Hale Arena in the West Bottoms? After the American Royal moves to KCK?
Comments are closed.