By Kevin Collison
The Royals believe a new downtown ballpark is the best move for the team’s future, telling the audience at their first “listening tour” event it would cost less than rebuilding The K and bring much more economic benefit to the community.
“For the Royals, our conclusion is clear,” said team owner John Sherman.
“It will be a far better investment to build new and move into or near the urban core of our community and create an energized district around our ballpark.”
Royals’ executives along with a team from Populous architecture laid out their case for what they estimated would be a $2 billion development, roughly half for the ballpark, the remainder for spinoff projects including apartments, retail, restaurants and office.
Sherman said the bulk of the funding for the ballpark district redevelopment would come from private sources. Jackson County taxpayers would be asked to extend the current 3/8th cents sales tax used for the Truman Sports Complex.
The earliest an election to extend the sales tax could occur would be next August, team officials said.
“We’re still early in this process to put together the financing and all that will be shared in great detail,” Sherman said.
“We’d expect private capital would take care of a major part of the ballpark and that private capital will develop all the district around it.”
It was the first stop on a listening tour the Royals are undertaking. A website on the ballpark district proposal can be found here.
About 350 people attended the first event held at Westport Plexpod, the former Westport Middle School in Midtown. The two-hour session was divided roughly in half, with a Royals presentation taking the first half followed by questions from attendees.
Earl Santee, global chair and founder of Kansas City-based Populous, one of the world’s premier sports architecture firms, said 14 sites have been examined in and around downtown.
According to sources, the Royals’ are most focused on the East Village site, an eight-block redevelopment zone northeast of City Hall.
As for remaining at Kauffman, Populous examined The K and determined the concrete in the 50 year-old facility was deteriorating, the pump room for the fountains leaking, and its electrical, cooling and heating systems were in need of replacement.
Santee estimated 70 percent of The K would have to be replaced to meet the goals of the team. The estimated cost of rebuilding Kauffman was $1.072 billion vs. $1.005 billion to build a new ballpark.
Sarah Tourville, Royals vice president for business operations, said staying put was not an option.
“The K will have outgrown its fullest functionalities by the time our lease expires at the end of the decade,” she said. “We are clear-eyed the Truman Sports Complex is not a viable option for us longterm.”
As for relocating the ball club downtown, team leaders said it opened a wide range of opportunities and would tap into what they said was the fastest growing market in the metropolitan area.
“Our exploration has shown us that Downtown Kansas City is younger, more diverse and growing at a faster clip than anywhere else in the greater metropolitan area,” Tourville said.
“A stadium project in or around downtown could become a catalyst for future retail and commercial growth, building on the momentum that’s continues to occur in Kansas City.”
A new ballpark would retain some of the tradition of the old, including fountains and the crown, and also be flexible for the fan experience officials see being demanded in the future.
It would have seating for 34,000- to 35,000 people, Santee said. An additional 3,000 fans could buy tickets to mingle and watch the game standing, a growing trend at major league parks.
As for parking, which has been a big concern of fans about relocating downtown, Santee said two independent studies have been conducted that determined it should not be an issue.
He estimated fans attending a ballgame need from 9,700- to 11,400 spaces, and the consultants estimated there were 55,000 spaces available in downtown.
“We could park not just one ballpark, but two ballparks downtown with the parking that’s available,” Santee said.
The Populous official also said downtown could provide ample parking for a game even if there’s an event occurring at the T-Mobile Center.
“We believe you could have concurrent events, a concert at T-Mobile and a ballgame,” Santee said. “Instead of half hour walk like Truman (Sports Complex), here the most you’d have with both venues is a 20 minute walk.”
In answer to a question about why the existing Truman Sports Complex has failed to attract significant spinoff development, the response was its location.
“There’s never been a lot of traction for development, part of it is finding the right kind of development, but it has been 52 years,” Santee said.
“There have been every opportunity for someone to come in and do something with the property. That’s not to say someone won’t.”
He was referring to plans by the Chiefs to redevelop the Kauffman site as an entertainment district after the Royals leave. While the Chiefs have been relatively quiet about their thinking, the owners have said they’d prefer to remain at the Arrowhead location.
“Our move closer to downtown would allow for the Chiefs to more fully maximize the facility in a manner they see fit,” Tourville said.
Sherman also was asked why only Jackson County taxpayers were being asked to help subsidize the billion dollar stadium. If that county sales tax was continued, it would generate an estimated $300- to $400 million dollars for each team over 30 years.
“I think Jackson Conty wants to keep both these teams in Jackson County,” Sherman replied.
“We talk about a bistate. Fundamentally this is a regional team, but from a political pespective…it’s just too complicated because of all the multiple jurisdictions.”
While pledging to the audience the Royals will remain in Kansas City, Sherman said the future prosperity of the franchise as at an important juncture.
That’s the reasoning behind pursuing a downtown ballpark.
“Today, we sit at a critical juncture for this team, also for the community and our partners across the parking lot at Truman Sports Complex, the Kansas City Chiefs,” Sherman said.
“We’re working closely together with them to take our teams forward to the next generation of major league sports in Kansas City.
“We may be on different timelines, but one thing is clear. We both intend for it to be something very special for our fans and the community we love.”
Don’t miss any downtown news, sign up for our weekly CityScene KC email review here.
I find it it so interesting that you did not even mention the opposing comments that have been made on this proposal and specifically by KC Tenants and their comments on gentrification and the negative effect on the people as they state in their letter. Other media commented on it. One wonders why you avoid an opposing opinion in this article, I know I certainly do.
The article was about the Royals ‘listening’ meeting and the interaction that occurred between the audience and the team representatives, KC Tenants either did not submit any questions or they weren’t used by the panel.
Think about moving the Royals back to where they started 23rd & Brooklyn , plenty of vacant land ,
Get out an explore your city, there is a subdivision with single family homes in that area now.
I feel opposing comments to a new ballpark are project-killer excuses and unsubstantiated at best. New in-town Ballparks (as most are now) are perfect examples of what to expect. San Diego, Denver, and San Francisco are to name a few. All were blighted areas without housing, parks, restaurants, or employment. All have now turned the neighborhoods around with parks where locals and others congregate, restaurants during the day for local employment, and destination ones for out-of-the-area patrons. Housing is a big factor also from expensive to affordable and everything in between. It creates a mass of locals to make an area vibrant day or night. groceries, dry cleaners, and a slew of other residential support businesses. The “new” locals don’t impact traffic since they are walking and not getting into cars to get around
I have been to all the areas mentioned and the Ballpark districts were the most memorable trips to those cities.
20,000 to 40,000 fans are typical at the above-named ballparks. I can’t wait for ownership to choose a location and I do hope that ownership saves enough money to build a winning team along with the ballpark!!
I wish John Sherman would raise some private financing to field a decent baseball team. I don’t think my fellow Jackson County taxpayers are too thrilled about continuing to pay the 3/8 cent sales tax any longer. Let the team move to Johnson County and let them pay for it. Lots of great sites there.
Comments are closed.